How we can help
Review of the ruling
We start with the full judgment or order and the submissions made in the proceedings. We identify the disputed issues, the court’s reasoning and the documents needed to assess a challenge, without assuming that another level of review is available.
Appeals before the High Court of Justice
We consider an appeal before the Administrative Chamber of the relevant High Court of Justice where it has jurisdiction and the ruling is appealable. We assess the grounds that could be raised and the work needed to prepare the case.
Cassation before the Supreme Court
We examine the requirements for cassation and the case’s objective interest for the development of case law. This assessment distinguishes disagreement with the outcome from a legal issue that may justify bringing the matter before the Supreme Court.
An informed decision
We explain the scope and limits of any appeal considered viable. Appeal and cassation are assessed separately. The engagement is defined around the ruling, the documents available and the strategy agreed with you after that initial review.
Frequently asked questions
Does every case proceed through appeal and then cassation?+
No. Each remedy has its own requirements, and not every ruling allows both routes. We assess availability before proposing any action.
Does an appeal allow the whole trial to be repeated?+
The scope depends on the remedy. We therefore assess which issues can be raised and which fall outside that particular route.
